|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
TOP STORIESAn important and overlooked reason why people expecting high bonuses this year may be deluded13 October 2009By Sarah Butcher In all the excitement about the potential size of this year’s bonuses (higher stock options and obligatory charitable donations not withstanding), an important factor has been overlooked: timing.
Historically, bonus season evolved roughly as follows:
• Goldman Sachs announced in mid-December
• Morgan Stanley, Lehman and Bear Stearns announced days after Goldman.
• Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, BofA, and JP Morgan announced in mid January.
• Deutsche, Credit Suisse and UBS announced in mid to late January.
• Remaining European banks announced in January and February.
This created a favourable dynamic: by announcing first, Goldman raised the game for everyone else. For example, in 2007/2008 John Mack was widely reputed to have increased Morgan Stanley bonuses (and with them, the bank’s compensation ratio), after apprehending just how much Goldman Sachs had paid out.
This has all changed. Now that Goldman has become a bank holding company, it will report its full year results in January.
As a result, and as the timing of this week’s 3Q announcements shows (Citigroup and Goldman both announce on the 15th, and JP Morgan announces on the 14th) earnings and bonuses are now likely to be announced almost simultaneously across different houses.
Henceforth, banks will have to second guess the size of rivals’ bonus pools, without the luxury of published compensation costs as a measuring stick. Goldman Sachs will no longer set the bar, and the bar will almost certainly fall.
COMMENTSMr. Frank White, Quantitative Analytics, Tue 13 Oct 09How do you apprehend how much another firm paid out.
Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCareers, HR & Recruitment, Tue 13 Oct 09@Frank - apprehend can also mean to grasp the meaning of something. Add your comment »goldmansachs, Accounting & Finance, Tue 13 Oct 09Is the word 'apprehend' the new goldman sachs? Add your comment »LOL, Capital Markets, Tue 13 Oct 09@goldmansachs........ This GS joke is getting a bit old now. Was funny only the first thousand times. Add your comment »Mr. Frank White, Quantitative Analytics, Tue 13 Oct 09@ Sarah, because it is a synonym does not make it a good substitute. Take the context into account. Add your comment »max1, Trading, Tue 13 Oct 09To sum it up, this point by Sarah is interesting and at least is not gossip etc and makes some sense. I am not bored anymore, only I am frightened. Add your comment » |
|
|
|||
| 18b, rue du Gothard, P.O. Box 325, 1225 Chêne-Bourg / Switzerland Tel.:+41 22/860 2103, Fax:+41 22/860 2115, E-mail:info@sfoa.org |
|||