TOP STORIES

An important and overlooked reason why people expecting high bonuses this year may be deluded


In all the excitement about the potential size of this year’s bonuses (higher stock options and obligatory charitable donations not withstanding), an important factor has been overlooked: timing.

Historically, bonus season evolved roughly as follows:

• Goldman Sachs announced in mid-December

• Morgan Stanley, Lehman and Bear Stearns announced days after Goldman.

• Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, BofA, and JP Morgan announced in mid January.

• Deutsche, Credit Suisse and UBS announced in mid to late January.

• Remaining European banks announced in January and February.

This created a favourable dynamic: by announcing first, Goldman raised the game for everyone else. For example, in 2007/2008 John Mack was widely reputed to have increased Morgan Stanley bonuses (and with them, the bank’s compensation ratio), after apprehending just how much Goldman Sachs had paid out.

This has all changed. Now that Goldman has become a bank holding company, it will report its full year results in January.

As a result, and as the timing of this week’s 3Q announcements shows (Citigroup and Goldman both announce on the 15th, and JP Morgan announces on the 14th) earnings and bonuses are now likely to be announced almost simultaneously across different houses.

Henceforth, banks will have to second guess the size of rivals’ bonus pools, without the luxury of published compensation costs as a measuring stick. Goldman Sachs will no longer set the bar, and the bar will almost certainly fall.

COMMENTS

Mr. Frank White, Quantitative Analytics,  Tue 13 Oct 09

How do you apprehend how much another firm paid out.
Comprehend?!

Add your comment »

Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCareers, HR & Recruitment,  Tue 13 Oct 09

@Frank - apprehend can also mean to grasp the meaning of something.

Add your comment »

goldmansachs, Accounting & Finance,  Tue 13 Oct 09

Is the word 'apprehend' the new goldman sachs?

Add your comment »

LOL, Capital Markets,  Tue 13 Oct 09

@goldmansachs........ This GS joke is getting a bit old now. Was funny only the first thousand times.

Add your comment »

Mr. Frank White, Quantitative Analytics,  Tue 13 Oct 09

@ Sarah, because it is a synonym does not make it a good substitute. Take the context into account.

Add your comment »

max1, Trading,  Tue 13 Oct 09

To sum it up, this point by Sarah is interesting and at least is not gossip etc  and makes some sense. I am not bored anymore, only I am frightened.

Add your comment »

ADD YOUR COMMENT

* Mandatory fields
Your name
Your field
Your Comment*
You have 1200 characters left
Image verification* ( What is this? )
Enter the code shown below or Sign in / Register to skip this step.
Disclaimer: All comments must adhere to eFinancialCareers Ltd’s Add your comment rules.
To complain about a comment, please email editor@efinancialcareers.com.
Careers Home  |   My eFinancialCareers  |   Find a Job  |   Post Resume
Search by Company  |   News & Advice  |   Search Resumes  |   Post a Job 
Career Center Career Center
  Job Seekers Sign in / Register Recruiter's Sign-in
18b, rue du Gothard, P.O. Box 325, 1225 Chêne-Bourg / Switzerland
Tel.:+41 22/860 2103, Fax:+41 22/860 2115, E-mail:info@sfoa.org